Wednesday, January 31, 2018

Celebrations of Death








INDIA: Traditions of Burial




"Life becomes transparent against the background of death, fundamental social and cultural issues are therefore revealed in death rituals" (25)





History of the Study of Religion:
  • Tylor & Intellectualism
    • religions arouse out of the contemplative states of death and dreaming which identified two worlds, This led to ideas of the afterlife and worlds of the dead.
    • religion was created through and intellectual exercise that precluded scientific knowledge (erroneous)
    • interested in bizarre and exotic beliefs of the uncivilized. (what these antiquated practices and beliefs couls say about the past)
  • Durkheim & the Sociology of Religion
    • religion expresses the moral cohesion of society, rather than the fears and imaginings of individuals.
    • death presents a FUNDAMENTAL problem, because it highlights the individual in society and threatens the integration of individuals through solidarity (mechanic or organic).  
    • death rituals present "collective representations" which repair society and reintegrate individuals into the structure. 
    • interested in how ritual (and religion) acted to integrate individuals (the glue) into society
    • "collective effervescence"- emotional arousal and alignment to create solidarity.
  • Arnold Van Gennep: Rites of Passage 
    • Identified a class of rituals that marked TRANSITIONS from one stage (status) to another (e.g. initiation, marriage, annual round, death).
    • Transition rituals all share a common tripartite structure:
      • Separation
      • Transition (liminal)
      • Reincorporation
    • The schema imagines that transitions begin with a distinction marked by"separation", Distinguish and mark stages of transition between the two categories (read Structuralism and its binary opposition-Levi Strauss) during the "transition" stage, which is inherently "liminal" (dangerous), and successfully conclude by passing  through this liminal stage to reintegrate (read Durkheim) an individual or group of individuals back into society in their altered status-thus preserving social solidarity). example:
      • death                            ONE DISTINCTION                    marriage
      • alive/dead                    TWO CATEGORIES               single/married
      • alive>dying>dead          THREE STAGES            single>engaged>married
    • Death and birth (rebirth) for cultures everywhere provide a METAPHOR through which to understand and imagine other (lesser) transitions.
    • Interested in providing a FRAMEWORK for understanding rituals within a particular social context-including our own. (Rituals EVERYWHERE can be understood through the same logical framework). 
    • Significance:
      • the integration of the individual into society
      • the nature of SYMBOLISM
      • the moral relativity of cultures
  • LIMINALITY: building on Van Gennep, American Anthropologist Victor Turner elaborates on the concept of Liminality as: 
    • "a state of transition, the inhabitants of which are BETWIXT and BETWEEN normal social roles, and close to some transcendent core of sacred moral value" (Turner 1967:94).
    • As such, liminality is sometimes autonomous of ritual, but is always a component in it. (structuralist)---marginal people, outcasts, bisexuals, biracial...etc.
    • To Van Gennep, liminality is always part of ritual and never autonomous (structural functionalist)
    • "communitas"- sense of emotional and social collectivity and belonging (in some ways the mirror image of Durkheim's "anomie"-the failure of society to integrate individuals into it's collective structure- to create a sense of belonging).
  • Robert Hertz: The Study of Secondary Burial


    • Focusing on funeral *(death rituals) in his study of ritual transitions and their functions, Hertz discusses societies that do not see death as instantaneous
    • INTERMEDIARY PERIOD (when the individual is neither alive or dead -liminal)
    • SECONDARY BURIAL at the end of this period there is a "great feast", where the remains are recovered, ritually processed and moved to a new location.
    • drawing principally from Indonesian culture, particularly Borneo, Hertz noted that minimally, the time between the two event had to be sufficient to have the flesh rot away and only dry bones remain. 
      • The fate of the corpse mirrored the fate of the soul. 
      • during this liminal intermediary phrase elaborate care is taken to avoid harm that the dangerous un-dead might inflict, unable to enter the land of the dead.
      • reincorporation reestablishes normal relationships among members of society
      • this special case was viewed as a way to see the GENERAL TENDENCY to view death through a method of manipulation of the corpse (how about American culture then!?)
        • Central Asia, North America, Indonesia, South America, Melanesia, and Greece
    • SYMBOLISM OF CORPSE (borrowed from Marcel Mauss: objects must be destroyed in this world in order to pass into the next. (sacrifice, slow decay, processing). 

Tuesday, January 30, 2018

The Loved One...America and Death denial (a view from Europe)

 The Loved One was written in 1948 by Evelyn Waugh, and acts as a mirror for America Culture to look at itself and its attitudes toward death and meaningful living from the perspective of European Culture.
  • Grim, funny and darkly satirical, it tells the story of Dennis Barlow’s experiences in Hollywood, amidst an expatriate community of ageing British writers. It contrasts the absurdities of two funeral businesses, one for pets, ‘The Happier Hunting Ground’ and the rather more deluxe surroundings of the ‘Whispering Glades Memorial Park’ (based on the Forest Lawn Memorial Parks) which serve the ‘Loved Ones’ of the novel’s title.
  • The satire of the novel might not be as immediately cutting today as it was when the book was published, due to the increasing influence of American culture on Britain over the years. 
    • The manner in which Waugh describes American women (HOW)
    • The depiction of the utterly callous ‘machine’ of Hollywood (HOW)


The following passages sum up Waugh’s impression of American women:
 "A young lady rose from a group of her fellows to welcome him, one of that new race of exquisite,amiable, efficient young ladies whom he had met everywhere in the United States.
She was the standard product. A man could leave such a girl in a delicatessen shop in New York, fly three thousand miles and find her again in the cigar stall at San Francisco."

There is one exception in the novel however, in the character of Aimée Thanatogenos:
 "the girl who now entered was unique. Not indefinably; the appropriate distinguishing epithet leapt to Dennis’s mind the moment he saw her: sole Eve in a bustling hygienic Eden, this girl was a decadent."

  • That Dennis is so drawn to this character (to the point of proposing marriage), and find her so unique in comparison to the other women he meets, before treating her so callously at the end of the novel, is interesting. 
  • The details of Aimée's history and family are lacking and it is perhaps this blankness which makes her eventual death so easy to cover up by Mr. Joyboy and Dennis, two men who both claimed to have loved her. 
  • Dennis’ whole attitude appears to change as the novel develops. (WHY)
    • One possibility was that the general atmosphere of the film “factory” of Hollywood may have disillusioned the young British writer in the way it had been experienced by so many of his predecessors, both real and literary. 
    • The image of the factory is also pertinent to the funeral business. 
      • Waugh depicts in the novel – endless ‘Loved Ones’ churned out as if on a production line, passing through different areas of the funeral home before their final presentation to the ‘Waiting Ones’ in the ‘Slumber Room’.
Why Hollywood?
  • Land of happy endings?
  • Death in films and tv is mostly handled in one of two ways: 
    • Spectacular, impersonal violence
    • or intense simple-minded sentimentality
  • One reason American Culture is so shallow, is because we ignore death?
  • Death Care industry takes care of it all and sanitizes it.
Arnold Toynbee (historian) once said,  "Death is un-American, an affront to every citizen's inalienable right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".

Why is Death an even more taboo subject than sex in american culture?

  • Modern America appears to be preoccupied with the preservation of youth and beauty, which is catered to by the plastic surgeon. Society seems content to cling to the illusion that youth--and life--can last forever.
  • However, the millions of dollars people spend to stay young (youth culture industry) will not delay the inevitable. The fact is that life will end, and how Americans choose to cope with this reality gives us an overall picture of our society's position on death; generally speaking, the American attitude is one of avoidance (or even defiance).
  1. Death Accepting Cultures: see death as part of life and deal directly with  death in quotidian contexts
  2. Death Denying Cultures: Avoid death and focus on living life while relegating death to private, ritual and impersonal contexts
  3. Death Defying Cultures: Deny that death is an inevitable threat and try to actively avoid interacting with it. Believe in the potential for conquering death through science and "success"
Elvis lives?

  • Perhaps the greatest example of Americans' view of death can be seen in how they cope with the passing of major celebrities--people whom they idolize to the point of assigning them a godlike status. To say that Elvis's (Michael Jackson's, Prince's, etc.) 1977 death affected Americans would be an understatement. "His death was a challenge to American popular culture and to its self-confidence...." (King 166). The shocked reaction to Presley's demise was not unlike that caused by President Kennedy's assassination (Ibid.).
  • Presley's body was displayed in an open casket at his home, dubbed "Graceland." Approximately 100,000 mourners gathered for his funeral and the committal service at Forest Hills Cemetery was bombarded with devastated fans. After the burial people continued to disturb the grave site, searching for whatever "relics" they could find. Presley and his mother were later disinterred and reburied at Graceland.
  • CONSPIRACY THEORIES: It was not long before people began questioning whether Elvis had actually died. Fans wanted to know the intimate details of his final days--they also asked "questions ... about his post mortem and death certificate".
    • Presley's appearance had changed over the years due to his addiction to prescription drugs--he had gotten chubby. The body in the coffin did not look like the Elvis so many remembered. 
    • Speculation ensued that the dead "Elvis" on display had been either another person or a wax dummy. Fans theorized that Elvis had planned to fake his death in order "to escape the pressures of his daily life ..." . 
    • People claimed to have had sightings of Elvis, the earlier ones being in Kalamazoo, Michigan...he has also been sighted "kneeling at the grave site of Jackie Kennedy...." It has even been claimed that Presley phoned Bill Clinton, "promising a comeback".
    • Elvis was not the first star to have been suspected of cheating death. "'... Glenn Miller, James Dean and Buddy Holly are also said to be lying comatose and horribly disfigured in remote sanatoriums.
    • This is all a prime example of denial of--and discomfort with--death that people would endeavor to immortalize a celebrity as they did Elvis. As King points out:



If Elvis is dead, then his supporters had themselves to confront the fact of death and to accept the transitory nature of their youth and its hopes and dreams. The denial of the facts of his death might negate the threat of transitory nature.
The responses to Elvis's passing "offer prime insights into contemporary American attitudes of death". "The King" has been dead for almost thirty years, yet fans still cling to the hope that a would-be seventy-year-old Elvis is alive and well, although in hiding.

Hospital and Medical Technology?
  • In the last hundred years, death was stripped of its place in everyday life and forced into the realm of terror. 
    • As the medical profession advanced and people went to die in hospitals, families were denied the full participation in the care of their loved ones which previous generations had, throughout the dying process and in the funeral rites. As a result, death became "invisible" to the average American.
    • The result of death's invisibility has been ignorance, fear, and denial.


Friday, January 5, 2018

Grief and Mourning: A Cross-Cultural Perspective (1/16 lecture notes)

Grief and Mourning: A Cross-Cultural Perspective
-An introduction to issues in the study of death across cultures.




The distinction between ‘grief’ and ‘mourning’: Is it supported*?
·      grief is a subjective state, a set of feelings that arise spontaneously after a significant death
·      mourning is a set of rituals or behaviors prescribed by culture's tradition.
*In this distinction, thought, or cognitive meaning, is largely absent from both grief and mourning because the former is mostly feelings and the latter mostly action. 


This distinction between grief and mourning does not hold up to cross-cultural scrutiny.
·      INDIVIDUALITY: The concept of grief is an artifact of modernity. Grief as a real subjective state grows from a culture that prizes and cultivates individual experience.
·      There is no equivalent to the term grief in some other languages
o   in some cultures, as in Japan, the concept of emotions that are only in the individual seems foreign. For the Japanese, individual identity is a function of social harmony. Emotions are part of family or community membership, sensed among the members so as to create a harmonized atmosphere.
o   The term mourning does have a Japanese equivalent, mo, which refers both to the ritual responses to death and the emotions—commonly defined in the West as "grief"—that attend them. 
o   Hitan, the Japanese word that comes closest to the English word grief, means "sadness and sorrow," but the word does not imply that the emotions were brought about by death or loss. Hitan cannot be used in a way that refers to a self-evident inner reality. " Kanojyo-ha hitan ni sizundeiru. " (She grief to sinking.) An qualifier like "to sink" is needed because in Japanese Hitan cannot be a complete state on its own.
o   With no Japanese word available, writers introducing Western psychological ideas have transliterate grief as guri-fu. 
o   How the English concepts of grief and mourning are translated in other languages and to look at how different words may change the way people might think about grief? (language and culture)



Is grief universal? (instinctual)
·      In every culture people cry or seem to want to cry after a death that is significant to them.
o   Attachment theory: Instinctual response programmed into our genetic inheritance, much as nest building or migration is hard-wired into birds. The response is aroused by the perception of specific situations (i.e., harm, threat, success or failure, and breeding opportunities). Culture, of course, influences how people appraise situations, yet similar perceptions of events trigger similar instinctual responses. A significant death, then, might be regarded as a universal trigger of grieving emotions, although which death is significant enough spark such a response depends on the value system of a particular culture. Universal instincts, then, might provide the basis for concepts that could explain behavior in all cultures.
o   Humans are attached to individuals all through their lives. When they die, individuals experience separation and loss, and so must reorganize their attachments to match the new reality.
o   But attachment alone is not a sufficient basis for cross-cultural comparison.
§  First, there is little cross-cultural research on attachment
§  The theory does not consider that as people mature their attachments become broader--As the child matures, each level of social membership or identity is also an attachment (e.g., clan, village, tribe, nation, religious tradition). At each level, separation becomes a less plausible explanation for grief because attachments to individual people become interwoven with social systems and cultural meanings that cannot be reduced to biological inheritance.
§  In the individualistic culture of the modern West, with its eroding attachments to larger social systems, primary social relationships are limited largely to monogamy and the nuclear family.
o   Death may arouse instinctual responses other than those that are labeled "grief" in cultures.
§  Some deaths in Western culture, for example, arouse a trauma response. It may be that the trauma response is as universal as the separation response in attachment.
§  In traditional Chinese culture, for example, death presents the problem of pollution. One of the purposes of funeral rituals was to protect men from pollution while women took the pollution on themselves, thereby purifying the deceased for the next life.
§  Powerlessness, separation, loss, and sometimes trauma …etc.



What is the symbolic meaning of death?
·      Death is used to understand other realities in human ‘life’.
o   For traditional Chinese women, for example, death was like marriage.
o   In the West the concept of grief is applied to other separations and losses, such as divorce, and to other traumas, such as home invasion.
·      When a significant person dies, the issue of meaning is central for the survivors:
o   What does this death mean?
o   What does this life mean?
o   What did this person mean to me and to this community? An individual seeks to make sense of his or her experience using cognitive or mental models that are supplied by that individual's culture.
·      Constuctivist model: the purpose of grief is the construction of durable biographies—individual and social narratives—of the dead person and of the survivors that enable the living to integrate the dead into their lives.
o   If something like an important death does not make sense, it is "nonsense." Both individuals and societies want to keep seeing the world the same way, but sometimes death forces one to see the world differently. When an individual sees the world differently, he or she constructs a new narrative, a new biography of themselves and of the person who has died.
o   People make sense of their world through social interaction. When something important happens in individuals' lives, they do not just think about it; they talk about it with others.
o   Grief and mourning do not just happen inside a person; they happen in the interactions between people.
o   In most cultures over human history, myth and ritual provide the intersubjective space in which one can construct the meaning of the deceased's life, death, and influence over the survivors' lives.
o   Differences in mourning behavior might be attributable to structural differences in societies.
§  In small, closely knit societies from mourning is different than in large, more loosely knit societies in which primary membership is in the nuclear family.
·      In small networks such as a rural village, members identify with people outside the nuclear family. When someone dies, people find substitutes for the deceased in their immediate social environment. Death disrupts the social structure of small networks, so mourning rites focus on rehabilitating the damaged role system by reallocating roles.
o   For example, when the elder dies, someone must be moved into the role of elder.
·      In more complex, loosely knit networks, such as in an industrialized city, most individual deaths do not significantly affect the larger social system, so grief loses any larger social meaning and becomes a matter of individual family and psychic readjustment.
o   Contemporary Western culture evinces a relative freedom of the individual from the constraints of cultural narrative. The price individuals pay for such freedom is a sense of inner loneliness that sociologists call "anomie." (Durkheim)
·      Grief becomes problematic when there is an incongruence of narratives within a level (e.g., an individual who is unable either to accept or reject contradictory stories).
·      Grief also becomes problematic when narratives at different levels of the hierarchy are incongruent (e.g., when individual's thoughts and emotions are incongruent with the family's understanding of what thoughts and expressions of emotion are acceptable).
·      A community's grief becomes problematic to itself when there are contradictory or incongruent narratives, such as when there is a disagreement about whether the high school students who kill themselves after they have killed other students should be memorialized along with those whom they killed.
·      A community's grief becomes problematic to other communities when the narratives are incongruent; for example, a gang's revenge narrative can be in conflict with the larger culture's narrative of the "rule of law" in which only the state can define and punish wrongful death.



How does society police grief?
·      It controls and instructs the bereaved about how to think, feel, and behave. All societies have rules about how the emotions of grief are to be displayed and handled.
o   In some cultures, for example, those who grieve should talk to the dead,
o   In other cultures the name of the dead should never be spoken.
o   Those who do not conform to the social expectations are labeled aberrant.
§  Anthropologist Unni Wikan, compared the rules in Egypt and Bali, both Islamic cultures. She found that in that in Bali, women were strongly discouraged from crying, while in Egypt women were considered abnormal if they did not incapacitate themselves in demonstrative weeping. (we will see that “culture” is a much stronger force than “religion” when it comes to death rituals)
§  In traditional China, women wailed laments but men sat silently. (gender distinctions are common).
§  They are often merely the directives for public performances that may or may not really express the mourners' private thoughts and feelings.



What are the roles played by the dead in individual lives and cultural systems?  
·      Persistent communion with the dead is a recurring behavioral pattern, far more common than an outright severing of all bonds across cultures.
·      Comparisons can be made between the changes in the relationship of the living and the dead during the mourning period.
·      Emile Durkheim: collective representations play a major role in developing social solidarity and identity in tribes, ethnic groups, and nations.
o   Grief and the rituals of mourning install the dead into collective memory as well as into the individual memories of those who knew them.
o   Grief then takes on a political meaning because one of the functions of all cultural narratives is to uphold the legitimacy of those who hold economic and political power.
§  In Chinese ancestor rituals, the dead remain part of the family, defining the values by which the family lives and creating the shared identity of the living members of the family (fits with their religious and kinship beliefs about their ancestors).



What will the cross-cultural study of grief show us?
·      At the biological level, the instincts aroused by a significant death;
·      At the linguistic level, the meanings and usage of the words that refer to what people call grief and mourning in the West.
·      At the level of social structure, the interchange between individuals and culture, grief and the resolution of grief happens in a series of nested cultural narratives—family, clan, tribe, community, subcultural, nation, religious tradition, and so on.


This semester we will look at all these levels of significance using the classic analyses of Metcalf and Huntington, as the basis for our wide-ranging analysis.  

Mourning: The Kaddish

Full reading I. Phases of Mourning There are  five stages  to the mourning process:  1) Aninut , pre-burial mourning.  2-3) Shiva...